Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.


Child Poverty Bill

That will not do, because the Secretary of State will have had advice from the commission, which will have had lots of information given to it. The Secretary of State could not just tear it up and say that he would not have any regard to it. That advice would cover not just the four individual targets but would address issues, one presumes, around socio-economic disadvantage. To write it off in the way the noble Lord has done is not appropriate. I accept his point that it is not as tightly and specifically defined as a clearly measurable target. However, there is a clear obligation on the Secretary of State to have a UK strategy that must do two things. In preparing that strategy, the Secretary of State must consider certain things. My noble friend had it right: the collection of requirements gives full value to the wording of the clause.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c279GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Conditions of employment Alcoholic drinks Disadvantaged Costs Finance Families Drugs Misconduct Low incomes Pay Membership Public appointments Poverty Minimum wage Misuse Nutrition Lone parents OECD countries Social security benefits Welfare tax credits Research Unemployment Self-employed UNICEF Child Poverty Commission Public health
Legislation
Child Poverty Bill 2008-09 to 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk