Proceeding contribution from Mark Hoban (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 25 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
When the right hon. Member for Birkenhead (Mr. Field) introduced new clause 8, I was intrigued by his arguments for its rationale. As he developed his argument from Maxwell and Sir John Cuckney to the role exercised by trustees in determining investment strategy and the use to which investments should be put, he made a strong case for improving the Government's arrangements for pension funds. However, if the purpose of his new clause was to prevent shares owned by pension funds from being used as a cover for short selling, he should perhaps have tabled a new clause in favour of naked short selling rather than one that restricted covered short selling to certain areas.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 504 c584
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Contracts Devolved matters Consumers Debts Bank services Banks Competition Cheques Credit agreements Credit Credit unions Building societies Bank of England Direct selling Credit cards Fees and charges EU law Financial services Financial institutions Exemptions Financial Services Authority Interest rates Financial markets Low incomes Northern Ireland Protection Pay Loans Office of Fair Trading Pension funds Registration Regulation Shares Unfair practices Council for Financial Stability
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 09:59:29 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614415
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614415
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614415