Proceeding contribution from Mark Hoban (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 25 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
Several people who complained about their charges referred the matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service, but the problem with the judgment reached by the Supreme Court is that the many complaints outstanding with the ombudsman and the county court system were left in limbo. The expectation, or the hope, was that if the OFT had won the case, it would have provided a framework for resolving the backlog of cases.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 504 c603
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Contracts Devolved matters Consumers Debts Bank services Banks Competition Cheques Credit agreements Credit Credit unions Building societies Bank of England Direct selling Credit cards Fees and charges EU law Financial services Financial institutions Exemptions Financial Services Authority Interest rates Financial markets Low incomes Northern Ireland Protection Pay Loans Office of Fair Trading Pension funds Registration Regulation Shares Unfair practices Council for Financial Stability
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 00:36:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614447
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614447
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614447