Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ian Pearson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 25 January 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.


Financial Services Bill

I have mentioned the protocol, as my hon. Friend knows. Clearly, the Bank needs to have the information it requires to perform its duties and responsibilities, but I do not think there is a massive point of principle. On amendment 8, the FSA is already required to submit an annual report. The new international duty proposed in the Bill is a new function for the FSA and the reporting requirement would apply automatically to it. Again, I do not believe that the amendment is necessary. Amendment 6 concerns information about financial assistance, as defined in section 257 of the Banking Act 2009. We believe that there are already appropriate reporting mechanisms in place— Debate interrupted (Programme Order, 30 November 2009). The Deputy Speaker put forthwith the Question already proposed from the Chair (Standing Order No. 83E), That the clause be read a Second time. Question negatived. The Deputy Speaker then put forthwith the Questions necessary for the disposal of the business to be concluded at that time (Standing Order No. 83E).


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
504 c633 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Contracts Devolved matters Consumers Debts Bank services Banks Competition Cheques Credit agreements Credit Credit unions Building societies Bank of England Direct selling Credit cards Fees and charges EU law Financial services Financial institutions Exemptions Financial Services Authority Interest rates Financial markets Low incomes Northern Ireland Protection Pay Loans Office of Fair Trading Pension funds Registration Regulation Shares Unfair practices Council for Financial Stability
Legislation
Financial Services Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk