Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 26 January 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Digital Economy Bill [HL].

Digital Economy Bill [HL]

My Lords, following on from the last group of amendments, I agree with the noble Earl, Lord Erroll, that consultation should be required before this power can be exercised. When we discussed Amendments 216, 217 and 218 a few minutes ago, my noble friend referred to disquiet at the possible overreaching powers of the Secretary of State. The Minister has, throughout Committee, been at pains to reassure us that there is no intention to abuse these powers. He used the words "last resort" when we debated that group. Nevertheless, these amendments would give some comfort to those who are worried.

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 716 c1402
Session: 2009-10
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Subjects: Codes of practice Costs Computer networks Copyright Communication ICT EU law Film Libraries Internet Higher education Electronic commerce Mobile phones Ofcom Music Radio frequencies Registration Universities Technology Video piracy Subscriptions Internet service providers Statutory instruments
Legislation: Digital Economy Bill (HL) 2009-10
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Digital Economy Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools