Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andrew Pelling (Independent (affiliation)) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 2 February 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Thameslink.


Thameslink

I apologise that I am not a member of the hon. Gentleman's all-party Thameslink route group. Someone who represents East Croydon station should definitely be a member of such a group. Would he agree that the small public sector investment in that station was important because it ended up relieving a great deal of stress and strain in terms of cross-London passenger traffic? Does that not emphasise how important it is for the Government to continue to be supportive of such initiatives? Huge amounts of money are being proposed for Crossrail, but north-south movements are just as important as east-west movements in the whole south-east and London area.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
505 c25-6WH 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Construction Railways Passengers Overcrowding First Capital Connect Bombardier Transportation Thameslink line
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk