Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Kelvin Hopkins (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 2 February 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Thameslink.


Thameslink

I thank my hon. Friend for that. It is welcome. One other point is that there are signalling and electrical power problems. Already there have been line-side fires in the tunnel between Farringdon and City Thameslink. That, I understand, is caused by arcing from the third rails, because the delivery for electricity to those tracks is at one end of that section of track rather than, typically, in the centre, which means that the voltages must be higher to drive the current longer distances. Those points have been made to me by engineers who understand these things—I have some technical knowledge myself—and they are serious matters. If one line-side fire stops 24 trains an hour, a two-hour blockage stops 48 trains, and if 48 12-car trains are suddenly stopped, we have a real crisis. We cannot afford to have things going wrong on a line of this importance any more than we could afford serious problems on some of the major underground routes. At least sometimes there are alternatives to underground routes. There may not be alternatives for Thameslink. I have raised those matters with the Minister to ensure that he is aware that there are potential engineering problems and to ask him to investigate the possibility of having a thorough review.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
505 c35-6WH 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Construction Railways Passengers Overcrowding First Capital Connect Bombardier Transportation Thameslink line
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk