Proceeding contribution from Baroness Murphy (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 February 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Personal Care at Home Bill.
Personal Care at Home Bill
I add my two penny worth to this amendment. I rather naively thought that there was a right of appeal; perhaps I have misunderstood. For example, there is a rather arbitrary cut-off point as regards whether a person receives half the attendance allowance or the full attendance allowance depending on the level of disability. The majority of appeals against the half-day rating are found for the appellant. Those decisions are often very arbitrary and are not founded on a proper understanding of the impact of a person’s disability. Therefore, it is clear to me that there must be a right of appeal. If it is not there automatically in the Bill, I add my support for the amendment, but I hope very much that the Minister will tell us that it is already in there.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 717 c824
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Care homes Appeals Carers Costs Community care Dementia Disability aids Hearing impairment Housing Finance Fees and charges Eligibility Expenditure Equipment Home care services Local government Private sector Recruitment Older people Staff Palliative care Mental health Scotland Visual impairment Training Wales Social services Personal budgets
- Legislation
- Personal Care at Home Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 19:56:19 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_622384
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_622384
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_622384