Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Joan Ruddock (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 February 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Blaydon (Mr. Anderson) for a superb Third Reading speech; I am glad to have heard it at this point because it much encouraged me. I shall try to respond to the points that must not remain on the record without a response being given and on which I have been asked questions. I asked the hon. Member for Wealden (Charles Hendry) to provide the details of the companies that supported his view that an EPS set at the right level would encourage investment. I must tell him that the Scottish and Southern Energy Group has said that""even legislation which provides for an EPS to be introduced at a level to be decided later, could deter investment, because it increases political risk"." RWE has said that""the threat of any introduction of an EPS would act as a strong deterrent for investment in new plant"." I believe that he is unable to support his arguments and, thus, his case for an EPS.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
506 c381 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Consumers Consumption Capital investment Coal fired power stations Carbon capture and storage Fees and charges Licensing EU law Electricity generation Ofgem Electricity Increases Fuel poverty Natural gas Pollution control Prices Standards Carbon emissions Climate Change Committee
Legislation
Energy Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk