Proceeding contribution from Lord Whitty (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 1 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Digital Economy Bill [HL].
Digital Economy Bill [HL]
My Lords, I will not pursue my amendment for the reasons that the Minister referred to—namely the unintended consequences for smaller ISPs. I was certainly not intending to drive them out of business. One needs to devise a trigger, and it would be better if the trigger were overt and in the Bill. On reflection, however, I do not think that my amendment achieves that. Therefore, before my noble friend replies, I should say that I will not press it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 717 c1297
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Disclosure of information Compensation Codes of practice Consumers Broadcasting Civil proceedings Climate change Competition Computer networks Copyright Digital broadcasting Broadband Communication Fees and charges ICT EU law Investment Infrastructure Exemptions Emergency services Intellectual property Libraries Internet Electronic publishing Newspaper press Public service broadcasting Ofcom Music Radio frequencies Universities Telecommunications Regulation Repairs and maintenance Rural areas Information Commissioner's Office Subscriptions Internet service providers
- Legislation
- Digital Economy Bill (HL) 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-05 10:22:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_625441
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_625441
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_625441