Proceeding contribution from Nigel Evans (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 9 March 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Motoring.
Motoring
I hope so. The camera will at least deter people from using the postbox. If we are serious about reducing accidents on the roads and reducing speed in certain areas, we ought to be open about using cameras. Static cameras must be yellow, and there must be signs telling people that they are approaching an area of potential problems. Hiding cameras shows clearly that there is no intention to indicate to motorists that they should slow down for a black spot; it is all about nabbing them, giving them three points and fining them. That simply should not be allowed. The Minister is nodding, but I have seen somebody hiding behind a letterbox. That should not be allowed. Speed cameras ought to be about road safety and speed awareness, not revenue raising. Average speed checks are better. The sooner we hold a review of speed cameras, the better.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 507 c5WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Costs Cars Cameras Excise duties Fuels Motor vehicles Pollution control Prices Sales Roads Road traffic control Speed limits Rural areas Tolls Motor insurance
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-06-21 11:51:10 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_628668
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_628668
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_628668