Proceeding contribution from Chris Mole (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 March 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Kent Coast Railway Line.
Kent Coast Railway Line
I am trying to understand how the hon. Gentleman justifies the assertion that fares across Kent have risen in order to support the high-speed link. I thought that it was generally understood by most people that the RPI plus 3 was to fund replacement of the slam-door stock, to which my hon. Friend the Member for Dover (Gwyn Prosser) referred, with the new trains on the Southeastern franchise.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 507 c118WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Capital investment Fares Infrastructure Franchises High speed trains Railways Standards Southeastern (2006-21) North Kent line
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 23:24:13 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629390
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629390
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629390