Proceeding contribution from William Cash (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 11 March 2010. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Assistance to Communities.
Assistance to Communities
The phrase "political purposes", which is the test against which so much of this is defined, is itself extremely difficult to define and will remain so. However, I think that I am right in saying that the RSPCA has occasionally got itself into difficulties in relation to the manner in which it dispenses some of its funds. I am not criticising it, but saying that there have been difficulties. The National Trust, too, has had difficulties in relation to the use of its land. The fact is that political campaigning—without making an absolutely clear distinction with purely political campaigning—quite often overlaps with social campaigning. It is difficult to draw a line between the two. It is not for us to solve that problem in this debate, but I ask the Minister to go away and seek more detail and analysis. I think that she will find that the definition of "political purposes" is becoming more and more difficult to understand.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 507 c177WH
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Charities Community development Bureaucracy Charitable donations Cooperatives Campaigns Finance Government assistance Vetting Social enterprises Voluntary work Citizens' advice bureaux
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 23:13:39 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630007
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630007
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630007