Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lawson of Blaby (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 March 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.


Financial Services Bill

My Lords, I am most grateful to the Minister for giving way, I am grateful too for his conditional apology, and I hope that he will look more closely at this. The point is, however, that in every country the Treasury and the central bank are separate, so what we are talking about is the specific issue of the supervisory and regulatory arrangements for financial institutions. It is a fundamental difference whether you have one or two covering conduct of business and prudential. The noble Lord was kind enough on Second Reading to say that he had put aside my memoirs for rereading. I love the "re"; I am most grateful to him for the "re". If he recalls, I described in my memoirs the White Paper on banking supervision, which I published a quarter of a century ago, in which I indicated how this issue could be strengthened. The one thing it had to be clear about is that prudential supervision and conduct of business regulation are two completely separate activities and it is damaging to put them together.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c517 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Codes of practice Banks Bank of England Financial services Government assistance Financial Services Authority Financial markets Economic situation Loans Meetings Regulation Treasury Council for Financial Stability
Legislation
Financial Services Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk