Proceeding contribution from Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 March 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
Many people have voiced their differences on the tripartite government system, and we are all concerned with that. Are not the Government building into this system further potential problems by having different definitions? The Minister explained it by describing what was required of the FSA but I cannot see that by putting in the definition of what the Bank of England has to look at in any way binds or changes what the FSA has to look at. Perhaps the Minister can explain that. He explained it via the FSA but the amendment has to do with the Bank of England.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 718 c544
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Codes of practice Banks Bank of England Financial services Government assistance Financial Services Authority Financial markets Economic situation Loans Meetings Regulation Treasury Council for Financial Stability
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:30:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631106
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631106
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_631106