Proceeding contribution from Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 24 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Flood and Water Management Bill.
Flood and Water Management Bill
I fear that the final question of the noble Duke, the Duke of Montrose, is a bit above my pay grade. We attach huge importance to the Bill. We are grateful for the general support of the opposition parties and of other Members on the Cross-Benches for what we are seeking to do—especially in the implementation of the Pitt report. We believe that the Bill will have the opportunity for adequate scrutiny when we combine what was done in the other place and what we are able to do in Grand Committee. Whether the Bill will go any further after today is, as I said, not a matter for me, but I am sure that the noble Duke's comments have been noted. Amendment 46 agreed. Amendment 47 not moved. Amendment 48 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 718 c379GC
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Conservation Construction Coastal areas Buildings Coastal erosion Housing Flood control Infrastructure Land drainage Inland waterways Environment Agency Floods Planning Railways Sustainable development Wales Urban areas Sewers Reservoirs Internal drainage boards
- Legislation
- Flood and Water Management Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:43:28 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633805
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633805
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633805