Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Young of Old Scone (Non-affiliated) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 April 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Flood and Water Management Bill.


Flood and Water Management Bill

I hope that we do not get confused here. This clause is aimed at three primary purposes: nature conservation, preservation of the cultural heritage, and people’s enjoyment of the natural heritage. It is not intended to determine what happens when the Environment Agency makes a decision about a flood risk management scheme around the coast. That is dealt with in other parts of the legislation that surrounds flood risk management. Therefore, whether or not a broader scheme, such as the Morecambe Bay scheme and some of the Essex setback schemes, goes ahead is determined on the basis of its flood risk management requirements. This clause simply refers to enabling the Environment Agency to make things wetter for nature conservation, for heritage or for enjoyment, but not for the basic purpose of flood risk management, which is covered elsewhere in legislation.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c576-7GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Codes of practice Agriculture Conservation Coastal areas Concessions Coastal erosion Fees and charges Flood control EU law Land drainage Insurance Inland waterways Horticulture Environment Agency Droughts Floods Irrigation Pilot schemes Planning Standards Water Voluntary organisations Telecommunications Wildlife Water companies Sewers Scouts and guides Social tariffs
Legislation
Flood and Water Management Bill 2009-10
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk