Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 April 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
My Lords, as the noble Lord’s amendment did not form part of what we expected to pass into the Bill today, I do not come with a specific assurance to give him, but let me say that he makes a very good case. It has been widely known for a long time that consumers are not well treated by the allocation processes. Not everyone can afford to pay off their balance monthly, and those people do not understand how it works. Although I cannot give the noble Lord a specific assurance, we are very sympathetic to some way being found to deal with that. Perhaps a code is the best way to start, with legislation following if necessary. On the noble Lord’s other two amendments, the Minister’s amendment to Clause 17 in part deals with the increased disclosure that the noble Lord seeks. We supported what the Minister produced, and I do not think that it is necessary to go quite as far as the noble Lord suggests.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 718 c1528
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Consumers Directors Bank services Banks Advisory services Credit cards Education Financial services Financial Services Authority Pay Regulation Council for Financial Stability Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2009-10
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:55:40 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_636544
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_636544
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_636544