Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour Independent) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 July 2010. It occurred during Debate on House of Lords: Working Practices.


House of Lords: Working Practices

I am not aware that the House debated or voted on any of the examples the Minister just gave. Something has been missing for change, and this is why we were advised not to go down the Procedure Committee route. No one is asking the Leader’s Group to put the whole agenda forward but, when it has considered issues, it should bring to the House not just recommendations about those issues that it agrees with, but other issues for the House to decide. We do not want to be told that the Leader’s Group has agreed all these things and to be asked whether we agree with them. What about the things it may not have agreed with? The House might have a view and therefore it must make the final decision about what goes on the agenda, not the Leader’s Group.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
720 c594 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Legislative process House of Lords House of Commons Legislation Membership Parliamentary procedure Parliamentary scrutiny Select committees Self-regulation Backbenchers Division of time Ministerial statements Oral questions Lord Speaker House of Lords Grand Committee
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk