Proceeding contribution from Mike Freer (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] (By Order).
London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] (By Order)
My hon. Friend makes a very good point, but if he wants to deal with the people who cause the litter, he should support the clause that requires people to supply their name and address when fixed penalty notices are being served. This is a pincer movement, because one provision deals with those who operate the businesses that generate the litter and the other clause deals with those who drop it, and therefore both sides of the argument are particularly covered. The cost of collecting litter in London runs to millions of pounds and it falls on the innocent taxpayer, so either the businesses have to be more responsible or the individuals who cause the litter have to be prosecuted. Either way, the Bill provides the necessary regulations to allow the London councils to get on with it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 516 c376
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disability Cafes Fixed penalties Greater London Hygiene Food Local government Motor vehicles Powers of entry Litter Powers Multiple occupation Packaging Pedestrian areas Public lavatories Standards Sales Safety Tenants Street trading Take-away food Sex establishments
- Legislation
- London Local Authorities Bill (HL) 2007-08 to 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:14:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_668092
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_668092
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_668092