Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mike Freer (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] (By Order).


London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] (By Order)

My hon. Friend is quite correct, but the big difference between a local authority or an ALMO and an offshore HMO operator is that the local council has democratically elected members who are responsible and accessible to their local residents. If council tenants, ALMO tenants or housing association tenants have a grievance about the way their stock is being managed, they have direct access to the board of the ALMO, which often includes local councillors, or to the local council. Although I appreciate that there may be difficulties, the major problem with HMOs is not with local authority stock. If the Government are seeking to loosen the regulation on HMOs and move to light-touch regulation, there must be checks and balances that do not allow us to abdicate responsibility. There must be some form of safety net to ensure that local authorities have the ability to step in if they believe that an HMO operator is putting tenants at risk, however deregulated the market becomes.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
516 c381 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Disability Cafes Fixed penalties Greater London Hygiene Food Local government Motor vehicles Powers of entry Litter Powers Multiple occupation Packaging Pedestrian areas Public lavatories Standards Sales Safety Tenants Street trading Take-away food Sex establishments
Legislation
London Local Authorities Bill (HL) 2007-08 to 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk