Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Christopher Chope (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] (By Order).


London Local Authorities Bill [Lords] (By Order)

My right hon. Friend brings his legal expertise to bear on this issue and asks a very pertinent question. I am not in a position to answer it, but if the promoter of the Bill—or the promoter's representative in this place today—wishes to intervene to do so, I will gladly give way. If the Bill has been as well prepared as one would hope after three years of gestation, one would expect that point to have been taken into account by its drafters—although perhaps we should not be so certain about that. The hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) was enthusiastic about the only parts of the Bill that my hon. Friend the Minister said the Government were concerned about. That is an interesting cameo within this debate. I hope my hon. Friend will stick to his guns in pursuing his concerns about clauses 11 to 22 and will insist that clause 23 is removed as being absolutely redundant.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
516 c395 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Disability Cafes Fixed penalties Greater London Hygiene Food Local government Motor vehicles Powers of entry Litter Powers Multiple occupation Packaging Pedestrian areas Public lavatories Standards Sales Safety Tenants Street trading Take-away food Sex establishments
Legislation
London Local Authorities Bill (HL) 2007-08 to 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk