Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Pannick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Bill [HL].


Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Bill [HL]

I am sorry to test the Minister's patience, but if I understand him—please correct me if I am wrong—he is saying that there may be circumstances in which the Treasury would restrict the amount of money that the person who is designated—his own money—may be able to use for his own legal representation. If I understand the Minister correctly, that is because of the risk of the money being diverted to terrorism. But surely, if the money is going to a person who is regulated as a legally qualified person, the Treasury would have to suspect that a solicitor or barrister is involved, in some way, in terrorism. That is a very serious matter that should be taken up with the proper regulatory authorities and not be the subject of restricting the designated person from obtaining the legal representation that he seeks.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
721 c1062-3 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Appeals Human rights Jurisdiction Financial services Financial institutions International cooperation Money laundering Terrorism Treasury Sequestration of assets Freezing of assets
Legislation
Terrorist Asset-freezing etc Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk