Proceeding contribution from David Gauke (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 8 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance (No.2) Bill.
Finance (No.2) Bill
The hon. Gentleman, who has been somewhat ingenious in tabling the new clause, again seeks to draw me into a wider debate about the implementation of child benefit. He sets out one way in which it could work; in other circumstances, claimants might seek to stop receiving child benefit. However, I must stress that, although he has been somewhat ingenious in raising the issue in the context of the Finance (No.2) Bill, the new clause has nothing to do with independent taxation, so I ask him to withdraw it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 518 c68
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Child benefit Corporation tax Banks Crew Employment Families Fisheries Incentives Income tax Film Financial services Financial institutions Independent taxation Economic situation Personal income Pay Mental capacity Profits Norway Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation Shipping Terminology Video games Tax rates and bands Self-employed Iceland Bank levy
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:35:33 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_677985
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_677985
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_677985