Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris Leslie (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 8 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance (No.2) Bill.


Finance (No.2) Bill

My hon. Friend highlights the fact that I cannot see this being the end of the matter. The Minister suggests that the measure is part of the Government's carefully calculated spending commitments, but I do not think that they will continue with the plan. There are so many anomalies and problems in its design and operation that they clearly did not think it through properly. They might have looked at the ready reckoner, saying ““Oh yes”” as they licked their lips at the £2.5 billion that they could take from families, and went straight to the first day of the Conservative party conference to announce their proposal, but it is unravelling by the moment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies and others are starting to highlight the economic perversities and distorting effect of this measure. Even the sole issue of independent taxation is sufficient to hole below the waterline the Government's plans to tax child benefit. I therefore hope that we can divide the House on the new clause. Question put, That the clause be read a Second time. The House divided: Ayes 218, Noes 302.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
518 c69-70 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Child benefit Corporation tax Banks Crew Employment Families Fisheries Incentives Income tax Film Financial services Financial institutions Independent taxation Economic situation Personal income Pay Mental capacity Profits Norway Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation Shipping Terminology Video games Tax rates and bands Self-employed Iceland Bank levy
Legislation
Finance (No. 2) Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk