Proceeding contribution from Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 17 February 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security.
Social Security
I had not planned to intervene, but I wanted to tease out the right hon. Gentleman's meaning. He is being a little disingenuous, so I invite him to be a little clearer. He knows that commitments are made for a Parliament, at most, and that if there were to be a change of power, the next Government could do whatever they want. He talks about ““for ever””, but decisions can be made at the next election. Can we tempt him to say on behalf of his party that during the lifetime of this Parliament—or perhaps for one year or two years—it supports the change to CPI? Or is he saying that his party utterly detests the change and will not support it?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 523 c1186
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Index linking Workplace pensions Social security benefits State retirement pensions Uprating Consumer prices index Average earnings
- Legislation
- Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011
- Social Security Benefits and Up-rating Order 2011
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-15 12:52:54 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_717785
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_717785
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_717785