Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 17 February 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security.


Social Security

We have had a worthwhile debate, with some thoughtful and well-informed contributions. I compliment all Members who have taken part, as the issue is important to our constituents. All Members will have received representations on the matter, and Members who are here on the final Thursday afternoon before a recess show their sense of priorities. I enjoyed the accusation from the right hon. Member for East Ham (Stephen Timms), whom I think of as my right hon. Friend, that the policy is ideologically driven. I have never heard the use of the geometric mean described as ideologically driven. Intriguingly, his position seemed to be that it would be bad to make such a proposal on a point of principle, but that he could support it if it was a temporary expedient because of a financial mess. That is not the position of the Government, whose judgment is that CPI is a better measure of inflation, not a temporary fix. I am grateful that he appeared to be saying that he would support us for three years on grounds of expediency.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
523 c1207 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Index linking Workplace pensions Social security benefits State retirement pensions Uprating Consumer prices index Average earnings
Legislation
Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2011
Social Security Benefits and Up-rating Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk