Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Oxburgh (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill [HL].


Energy Bill [HL]

My Lords, I, too, have some sympathy with the interest of the noble Lord, Lord Lea of Crondall, in proposing this amendment. However, I, too, do not feel that this is the way forward. This is a very big matter and requires very careful consideration. At this point, I think I have an opportunity to offend all political parties in the House by saying that within the energy industry there is bewilderment that pretty much all the political parties believe that energy poverty should be treated separately from every other sort of poverty at the expense of distorting our energy market and our energy costing. In the view of many outside, it would be much more sensible to let energy prices do what they must. It is inevitable that we go into a more expensive energy world and handle the whole poverty problem together.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
725 c1579-80 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Consumers Conservation Housing Energy Electricity generation Energy supply Increases Fuel poverty Low incomes Prices Microgeneration Offshore industry National park authorities Renewable energy Broads Authority Norfolk and Suffolk Broads
Legislation
Energy Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk