Proceeding contribution from Andrew George (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 9 March 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Water and Sewerage Charges (South West Water).
Water and Sewerage Charges (South West Water)
One of the reasons why Ofwat might not be particularly effective in protecting South West Water customers is that when water was privatised, a risk-free money-making system was effectively created. When somebody has a monopoly on services such as water and sewerage services, that is bound to happen. However, the problem in the south-west is that there is a national asset—the beaches—that has to be cleared up and cleaned up at great expense by a very small part of the population. The south-west has 30% of the national beaches, but only 3% of the national population. Of course, if we compare that with the National Gallery or the British Museum, which are funded from national taxation, we in the south-west have to protect a national asset on the basis of having only 3% of the population. That is simply unsustainable.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 524 c248WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Consumers Billing Ofwat Protection Meters Water charges Sewers South West Water South West Charging for Household Water and Sewerage Services Independent Review Social tariffs
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:06:53 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_723734
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_723734
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_723734