Proceeding contribution from Lord Boswell of Aynho (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill [HL].
Pensions Bill [HL]
The noble Lord is entirely right to correct me. I had added the words ““per annum””, which are not in the calculations. However, it is still a very substantial sum, and I do not think that Governments at the present juncture can forgo that. To put it another way, they would have to find an alternative means of financing even proposals that I put forward in Committee, which we may touch on later. Those were alleged to be likely to cost £7 billion, which, frankly, is rather more than I had anticipated or indeed would be sustainable. We are into a difficult calculation, but we cannot, in the circumstances of longevity, responsibly countenance the noble Lord’s amendment as it is at the moment. However, if for some reason the figures are not as pessimistic as we thought, I would very much like to hear my noble friend’s response when the time comes.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 726 c1255
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Age Contributions Women Equality EU law Health and safety Ethnic groups Pension credit Personal savings Pay Workplace pensions Pensions Manual workers Part-time employment Lump sum payments State retirement pensions Tax allowances State second pension National employment savings trust scheme Universal credit
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:55:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732798
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732798
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732798