Proceeding contribution from Baroness Murphy (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill [HL].
Pensions Bill [HL]
Although he is clearly hampered by the commitment to the directive, it does not seem to be beyond the wit of the Minister and his colleagues to devise a rather warmer response to the wish of this House that a compromise should be made. Given my experience on previous occasions, I think that it would be a good idea for the House to express its opinion on this matter. I wish to test the opinion of the House on this amendment. Division on Amendment 3 Contents 203; Not-Contents 215. Amendment 3 disagreed. Amendments 4 to 8 not moved. Amendment 9 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 726 c1280
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Age Contributions Women Equality EU law Health and safety Ethnic groups Pension credit Personal savings Pay Workplace pensions Pensions Manual workers Part-time employment Lump sum payments State retirement pensions Tax allowances State second pension National employment savings trust scheme Universal credit
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:56:27 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732823
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732823
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732823