Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill.


Postal Services Bill

My Lords, first, I thank sincerely the Minister and her team for producing Amendment 54. I am touched by how this has been done, which satisfies to a great extent concerns that have been in my mind ever since privatisation was first mentioned—I think that was in 1970-something. Amendment 55 may appear to be going over the top a bit but any report dealing with sold-off public assets should have some reference in the accounting procedure to the donations received in cash or in kind by the museum, so that people can keep a track of what has come in and what is going out. Before I sit down, I should say that I have slipped up, as I should have mentioned in an earlier discussion the wonderful GPO film unit, which is another one that seems to have slipped off the edge. Anybody who wants to see how the GPO prepared for the Second World War—for maintaining its services during that period—should go to the archives, where the DVDs are on sale. They really are worth watching. Again, I thank the Minister for her courtesy.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
727 c506-7 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Assets Costs Bank services Closures Capital investment Archives Pensioners Northern Ireland Privatisation Pensions Museums and galleries Public consultation Post offices Pension funds Profit sharing Postal services Postal Services Commission Post Office Scotland Small businesses Shares Reform Wales Valuation Trusts Rural areas Royal Mail Universal service obligation
Legislation
Postal Services Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk