Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill.


Postal Services Bill

My Lords, I was not going to intervene, but because the noble Lord, Lord Low of Dalston, raised the point I made in Committee, we should put on the record that after the noble Baroness looked into this point she wrote to both of us and said that we were actually both right. As the noble Lord indicated, the cost of delivering items of mail in London is more or less the same as the cost in rural areas, and is significantly greater than the cost in other United Kingdom cities. The point that I was trying to make, obviously inelegantly, was that if I was really worried about what would happen I would worry about London. It is not only that the cost of delivery in London is greater, but London is such a huge element in the costs of Royal Mail, which has huge overheads, any third party looking at the overall cost of the Royal Mail—rather than looking at the Orkneys and Shetland—will have to look at the costs in London. It is Hackney that ought to worry, rather than the Orkneys and Shetland. That was the point I was trying to make.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
727 c514 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Assets Costs Bank services Closures Capital investment Archives Pensioners Northern Ireland Privatisation Pensions Museums and galleries Public consultation Post offices Pension funds Profit sharing Postal services Postal Services Commission Post Office Scotland Small businesses Shares Reform Wales Valuation Trusts Rural areas Royal Mail Universal service obligation
Legislation
Postal Services Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk