Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill.


Postal Services Bill

I shall briefly support my noble friend Lord Whitty. He has made all the key points about the importance of the additional information that the amendments would provide. I tend to agree with the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, in a previous debate about the potential for locals. They have to get the formula right; they have to get the transition payments right as well. The managing director, Paula Vennells, has assured us that they are learning quite a lot from the 60 or so pilots that are currently running. Interestingly, I received an assurance that they have all been instructed to accept parcels of up to 20 kilograms in weight. Clearly, the message has not filtered through to all of them but the intention is clear. Amendments 40 and 41 pose some important questions and I, too, will be listening intently to the Minister’s response.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
727 c549 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Assets Costs Bank services Closures Capital investment Archives Pensioners Northern Ireland Privatisation Pensions Museums and galleries Public consultation Post offices Pension funds Profit sharing Postal services Postal Services Commission Post Office Scotland Small businesses Shares Reform Wales Valuation Trusts Rural areas Royal Mail Universal service obligation
Legislation
Postal Services Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk