Proceeding contribution from Stephen Phillips (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education Bill.
Education Bill
As someone who benefited from the assisted places scheme, I can perhaps understand more than most the right hon. Gentleman's argument about what his provision might do for pupils' life chances. I have no concluded view on the new clause, which I shall consider carefully—I am sure the rest of the House will do so, too—but why would an academy that purchased a place at a public school for one of its pupils spend less on that pupil than if it maintained them in the academy?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 527 c1193
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Admissions Discipline Disadvantaged Boarding schools Classroom assistants Finance Fees and charges Further education Education maintenance allowance Home education Local government Private education Pre-school education Pupil exclusions Pupils Standards Teachers Special educational needs Vocational guidance Secondary education Right of search Per capita costs Academies Pupil referral units English baccalaureate Maintained schools
- Legislation
- Education Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:06:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_741027
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_741027
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_741027