Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Graham Stuart (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education Bill.


Education Bill

The hon. Lady makes some fair points. Certainly the right of the child is central, but I believe that the parent is the best protector of that child's needs. Of course, the local authority has a role in intervening when there is problem. However, fewer than half the children in this country get five good GCSEs as a result of compulsory state schooling for 11 years, so the state is hardly in a position to lecture parents who make a massive sacrifice to find ways of educating their children themselves. Furthermore, according to all the evidence that I have seen, there is no suggestion that home-educating parents—although they might be rather radical and act in ways that would not fit with my idea of how to educate a child—do a worse job for their children educationally than the state; quite the opposite, in fact. It is interesting that, although Badman selectively quoted evidence from New Zealand, he failed to mention that, just before he produced his report, New Zealand scrapped the registration guidelines that formed a central part of the report.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
527 c1218-9 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Admissions Discipline Disadvantaged Boarding schools Classroom assistants Finance Fees and charges Further education Education maintenance allowance Home education Local government Private education Pre-school education Pupil exclusions Pupils Standards Teachers Special educational needs Vocational guidance Secondary education Right of search Per capita costs Academies Pupil referral units English baccalaureate Maintained schools
Legislation
Education Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk