Proceeding contribution from Lord Rogan (Ulster Unionist Party) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill.
Postal Services Bill
I thank the Minister for her reply. However, I feel that she could have gone further. Therefore, I wish to test the opinion of the House. Division on Amendment 63B Contents 165; Not-Contents 235. Amendment 63B disagreed. Clause 32 : Exceptions to minimum requirements Amendment 64 Clause 32 : Exceptions to minimum requirements Amendment 64 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 727 c1309
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Privatisation Post offices Postal services Ofcom Post Office Regulation Reform Royal Mail Universal service obligation
- Legislation
- Postal Services Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:17:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743440
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743440
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743440