Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 May 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Privacy Injunctions.
Privacy Injunctions
My Lords, I, too, greatly welcome the Statement and the report on which it is based. In recent years, one problem has been that a belief has got about that judges have a wide discretion on whether to grant a super-injunction. The report makes it absolutely clear, in paragraph 1.33, as recent cases had already made it clear, that there is no such discretion. The principle of open justice prevails unless it is absolutely and strictly necessary to depart from that principle in order to do justice in a particular case. That has long been the position and it is very good that it should have been reasserted in this Statement and report. They are obliged to act in accordance with the law as stated; they have no discretion.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 727 c1638
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Enforcement Judgements Freedom of expression Injunctions Privacy Joint select committees Secrecy
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:10:49 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745257
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745257
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745257