Skip to main content

Ministerial statement on Monday, 23 May 2011, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Wallace of Tankerness.


Privacy Injunctions

Lords statement on privacy injunctions.


Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
727 c1634-43 
Session
2010-12
Department
Advocate General for Scotland
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Proceeding contributions
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 727 c1639 (Link to this contribution) Does my noble and learned friend accept that Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, ...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1639-40 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, my noble friend is right to quote at length Article 10. As I said earlier to the noble and...
Show all contributions (30)
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1640 (Link to this contribution) I would certainly agree with the noble Lord. No doubt when the Joint Committee comes to take evidenc...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1639 (Link to this contribution) I certainly hear what the noble Lord says and, as he has indicated, the terms of reference are still...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 727 c1639 (Link to this contribution) We on these Benches welcome the report, which recognises that where secrecy is ordered it should onl...
Lord Elystan-Morgan | 727 c1640 (Link to this contribution) Does the Minister accept that the Bill of Rights and the Parliamentary Papers Act 1840 were passed i...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1640 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, as I have already made clear, it is almost self-evident that the Bill of Rights 1689 and t...
Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws | 727 c1640-1 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I, too, welcome the establishment of the Joint Committee. What I really want to ask is whe...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1643 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am sure that my noble friend would agree that it would not be proper for me to comment o...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1642 (Link to this contribution) As I indicated, it is a draft Bill, so there will be opportunity to consider issues on parliamentary...
Lord Inglewood | 727 c1642 (Link to this contribution) In his opening remarks, my noble and learned friend referred to consultation with the other place ab...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1641 (Link to this contribution) It will not surprise the noble Lord that my department brought that case to my attention this mornin...
Lord Davies of Stamford | 727 c1642 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I strongly support the suggestion made by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay, that th...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1641 (Link to this contribution) That is the challenge to all parliamentarians—to reflect the views of the people. As my right honour...
Lord Wright of Richmond | 727 c1641 (Link to this contribution) May I be allowed very briefly to remind the House of one respect in which the events of last weekend...
Lord Fellowes of West Stafford | 727 c1641 (Link to this contribution) Does my noble and learned friend accept that in a settled society, the strength of its laws derives ...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1642 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I endorse those last comments about the importance of the internet and electronic media. T...
Lord Stoneham of Droxford | 727 c1642-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I welcome the report in the interests of open justice. The issue that I raised last Thursd...
Lord Soley | 727 c1638 (Link to this contribution) I put forward a Bill some 20 years ago on the freedom and responsibility of the press. I think that ...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1638 (Link to this contribution) The noble and learned Lord is right that they must apply the law as it is. It is important, as the r...
Lord Lloyd of Berwick | 727 c1638 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I, too, greatly welcome the Statement and the report on which it is based. In recent years...
Baroness Garden of Frognal | 727 c1638 (Link to this contribution) May I remind noble Lords that interventions should be brief in this session?
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1634-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I wish to repeat as a Statement an Answer given to an Urgent Question in the other place b...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1637-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, my noble and learned friend raises some important—indeed, fundamental—points. I do not thi...
Lord Mackay of Clashfern | 727 c1637 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I very much welcome this Statement. I also welcome what the noble and learned Lord, Lord F...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1636-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the noble and learned Lord for his response and for his general welcome both to th...
Lord Falconer of Thoroton | 727 c1635-6 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord for repeating the Attorney-General’s Statement. I agree ...
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 727 c1641 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the noble Baroness raises an obvious but very important issue on the new media, whose rele...
Lord Clinton-Davis | 727 c1640 (Link to this contribution) Would the Minister underline for the benefit of the Joint Committee that the Law Society and the Bar...
Subjects
Enforcement Judgements Freedom of expression Injunctions Privacy Joint select committees Secrecy
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk