Proceeding contribution from Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 May 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Privacy Injunctions.
Privacy Injunctions
Does my noble and learned friend accept that Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which provides for the right to freedom of expression, is qualified? It is that the exercise of that freedom, "““carries with it duties and responsibilities””," and, "““may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society””." It specifically refers to, "““the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary””." Would he agree with me that judicial authority must be maintained? As the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer, said, the court sees the evidence and comes to a balanced judgment, and any attempt to interfere with that, even by the use of parliamentary privilege, simply because a politician cannot agree with the judgment when he does not know the facts, is to be deplored?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 727 c1639
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Enforcement Judgements Freedom of expression Injunctions Privacy Joint select committees Secrecy
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:10:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745263
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745263
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745263