Proceeding contribution from Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 May 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Privacy Injunctions.
Privacy Injunctions
Does the Minister accept that the Bill of Rights and the Parliamentary Papers Act 1840 were passed in ages very different from our own and dealt with circumstances very different from those now relevant? Does he accept that the effect of those Acts very often is to make it possible for a statement to be made in Parliament that would be utterly contumelious of a decision of the courts were it not for the particular privilege thereby conferred? Will he encourage those who sit on the Joint Committee to be bold and imaginative in these circumstances and to see to it that the law of the land is not flouted, save in those rare, almost unique, circumstances where parliamentary privilege should be allowed to cloak such an action?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 727 c1640
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Enforcement Judgements Freedom of expression Injunctions Privacy Joint select committees Secrecy
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:10:19 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745267
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745267
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745267