Proceeding contribution from Lord Strathclyde (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 June 2011. It occurred during Legislative debate on Draft House of Lords Reform Bill.
Draft House of Lords Reform Bill
My Lords, I think that we have had a useful debate because for the past few weeks there has been an air of controversy over what the conclusions of the report of the noble Lord, Lord Cunningham, meant when they were initially published. But I agree with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd, that the amendment to the Motion is not necessary. I therefore invite the noble Lord, Lord Cunningham, to respond and, I hope, to withdraw his amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 728 c146
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- House of Lords House of Commons Powers Reform Joint Committee on Conventions Joint Committee on the Draft House of Lords Reform Bill
- Legislation
- Draft House of Lords Reform Bill
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:17:53 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_746417
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_746417
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_746417