Skip to main content

1-20 of 257 results for subject:"Joint Committee on Conventions"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

This Lords Library briefing provides an overview of delegated legislation in the House of Lords since 1997.

Type
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords
Date
5 January 2016
Reference
LLN-2016-0001

My Lords, given that my Motion has attracted an amendment, I should say a few words about it. The Motion proposes a Joint Committee on the draft House of Lords Reform Bill published last month, and does so in the usual way by referring the draft Bill and accompanying White...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c136-7
House
House of Lords

After ““(Cm 8077),”” insert ““and, mindful of the need to protect the primacy of the House of Commons, that it be an instruction to the committee to take into account the conclusions of the Joint Committee on Conventions which was noted with approval by both Houses””.

Member
Lord Cunningham of Felling (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c137
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by thanking the noble Lord the Leader of the House for his comments and for the even-handed way in which he introduced the resolution. However, I am bound to say that there are some people—I do not ascribe this view to the Leader of the House—who...

Member
Lord Cunningham of Felling (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c137-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support everything that the noble Lord, Lord Cunningham, has said. I believe that he has performed a signal service for the House this afternoon by putting down the amendment and by moving it so eloquently. It is crucial that this committee, when established, reflects the varying positions...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c138-9
House
House of Lords

That it is expedient that a Joint Committee of Lords and Commons be appointed to consider and report on the draft House of Lords Reform Bill presented to both Houses on 17 May (Cm 8077), and that the committee should report on the draft Bill by 29 February 2012.

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c136
House
House of Lords

House of Lords Reform Bill (Draft). Lords debate on motion that it is expedient that a Joint Committee of Lords and Commons be appointed to consider and report on the draft House of Lords Reform Bill presented to both Houses on 17 May (Cm 8077), and that the committee should...

Lead member
Lord Strathclyde
Type
Legislative debates
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c136-47
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I just want briefly to say that, as the sole surviving Cross-Bench Member of the committee chaired by the noble Lord, Lord Cunningham, I strongly support his amendment. If he decides to seek the opinion of the House, I shall vote for it.

Member
Lord Wright of Richmond (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c145
House
House of Lords

If this matter is to be put to a vote—I do not know whether it will be—it is important that we should know what it is we are voting on. As I understand the amendment, it is to be an instruction that the joint body should ““take account”” of something....

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c146
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Leader of the House. I have only one or two brief points. This amendment is carefully couched in terms that could engender cross-party, if not universal, support in this Chamber. It is not about kicking anything into the long grass, and I regard that intervention...

Member
Lord Cunningham of Felling (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c147
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that we have had a useful debate because for the past few weeks there has been an air of controversy over what the conclusions of the report of the noble Lord, Lord Cunningham, meant when they were initially published. But I agree with the noble and...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c146
House
House of Lords

Is the Leader of the House saying, in other words, that the amendment moved by my noble friend Lord Cunningham is acceptable?

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c146
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this might be a good time for me to reply. My purpose in laying out the Government’s view at the outset was to try to pour some oil on troubled waters, a task in which I spectacularly failed. A number of key issues have been raised and perhaps...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c145-6
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord tell the House how many times the committee led by the Deputy Prime Minister met in order to arrive at the conclusions that are now represented in the White Paper and the draft Bill?

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c146
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what I am saying is that, first, it is unnecessary, and secondly, everything in the noble Lord’s amendment will, I am sure, be taken into account by the Joint Committee.

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c146
House
House of Lords

My Lords, any proposed reform of your Lordships' House clearly puts the cart before the horse. Given that a majority—or at least a very great deal—of our national law is now made in Brussels, with the House of Commons and your Lordships' House irrelevant in the process, why do we...

Member
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c141-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will express a view that is shared by a minority in House—perhaps a very small minority. I start by saying clearly that I am in favour of a 100 per cent elected House. However, there are consequences to some words in the amendment of my noble friend...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c141
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support the amendment in the name of my noble friend Lord Cunningham. I do so because it goes to the heart of what the debate about reform of the second Chamber should be. It focuses on the powers of the two Houses and the relationship between...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c139-41
House
House of Lords

Why do the Government consider it necessary to impose any deadline on completion of the work of the Joint Committee? Given the importance and complexity of that work, would it not be more appropriate to trust the Joint Committee to determine how long it requires? The Leader of the House...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c139
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak very briefly. The British community has mulled over the question of the reform of this place for over a century. It is now the case that a Committee will be asked to exercise its collective wisdom within the short compass of nine months. It may...

Member
Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 June 2011
Reference
728 c144
House
House of Lords