Proceeding contribution from Lord Strathclyde (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 June 2011. It occurred during Debate on House of Lords: Working Practices.
House of Lords: Working Practices
Denying a government Bill that had already passed the House of Commons a Second Reading would be an extraordinary thing. There would be another problem. For Bills that started in the House of Lords, if this were not a Joint Committee—I think that there is much more merit in being a Joint Committee than a House of Lords Committee, which I know was the recommendation of the committee—the business managers would seek to avoid starting Bills in the House of Lords. As Leader of the Lords, I think that would be a very bad thing. There are issues here that need to be explored further. There are downsides too, but the basic aim is a good one.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 728 c1625
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Conduct Committees Debates Legislative process House of Lords Legislation Legislative drafting Parliamentary procedure Parliamentary scrutiny Peers Self-regulation Whips Backbenchers Division of time Ministerial statements Times of sittings Oral questions House of Lords chamber Leader of the House of Lords Lord Speaker House of Lords Grand Committee House of Lords Leader's Group on the Working Practices of the House of Lords
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:06:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_753543
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_753543
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_753543