Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.


Education Bill

My Lords, since the noble Baroness is in writing mood, will she enlarge slightly on the questions that I asked in regard to the second amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Lexden? If we are focusing hard on trying to get high-quality teachers, we need to be careful to ensure that we have not built into the system disincentives to getting rid of teachers who are not up to the grade. It was always the problem with hanging someone for stealing a sheep that juries would never convict. It seems to me that we have a similar situation here, as the penalty for failing an induction year is so harsh—the person may never teach in a maintained school again. Most people strain to get these individuals through their induction year and to pass them just because the penalty is so harsh rather than because they have done well enough to be passed into the teaching profession with all flags flying. Therefore, I would like to understand the logic behind the Government’s decision to keep it as ““once only”” rather than allowing a second chance.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c139GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Discipline Crime Defamation Classroom assistants Education General Teaching Council Qualifications Protection Private education Pupils Newspaper press Media Standards Telecommunications Teachers Training Young offenders Academies Free schools International schools Maintained schools
Legislation
Education Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk