Proceeding contribution from Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.
Education Bill
Perhaps I may respond to that point because we want to get on. We are proposing the perpetuation of the current situation. The people who are currently responsible, the local authorities and other bodies, would continue as now to be responsible. The legislative regulatory framework in terms of employment law, equality law and everything else remains in place. It is not the case that the proposed abolition of the SSSNB would change what we currently have going on. The change would have been if the SSSNB had gone ahead.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c210GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Curriculum Disadvantaged Conduct Classroom assistants ICT Education Internet Pre-school education Pupils Working conditions Standards Schools Teachers Special educational needs Training Sports Vocational education Training and Development Agency for Schools School Support Staff Negotiating Body English baccalaureate
- Legislation
- Education Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:13:33 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758377
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758377
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758377