Proceeding contribution from Lord Marland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 July 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Storage of Carbon Dioxide (Access to Infrastructure) Regulations 2011.
Storage of Carbon Dioxide (Access to Infrastructure) Regulations 2011
Where does it stop? At what point is someone independent if the word means that they are able to take an objective and independent view of the problem? I do not disagree with the right reverend Prelate on the conclusion that we are trying to achieve. As I referenced earlier, I think that it needs further thought and a straighter edge. I readily said that we should perhaps try to get a little more detail on it. I do not have a prescription now. I am not necessarily sure that we should have a prescription now, but I am happy to carry on the discussion outside the Committee because it is at the margin of the reality and focus of the issue of CCS. To use the words of the noble Baroness, let us hope that it does not get to the point where we have to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c274GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Carbon dioxide EU law Energy Scotland Storage Safety
- Legislation
- Storage of Carbon Dioxide (Access to Infrastructure) Regulations 2011
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 20:48:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759656
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759656
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759656