Proceeding contribution from Liam Fox (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 13 July 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Mull of Kintyre Review.
Mull of Kintyre Review
The hon. Lady raises a very interesting point, and it is one that I raised with Lord Philip and his team. Given that I think there is wide acceptance in the House that they came to a conclusion that had been missed too often by previous inquiries, the question is: why? I have asked Lord Philip whether he would mind setting out why he thought this particular inquiry had worked, and, from his perspective and that of his team, why they thought they were able to get at the kernel of truth that was missed so many times in the past. Looking at their methods, and how they went about drawing up their report, would be hugely instructive and helpful as a template for similar inquiries in the future.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 531 c348-9
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accidents Air force Crew Intelligence services National security Negligence Transport Chinook helicopters Mull of Kintyre Mull of Kintyre Crash Review Cook, Richard Tapper, Jonathan
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:41:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_760189
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_760189
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_760189