Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.

Localism Bill

I may need to think about that and write to my noble friend. However, it seems to me that the in-house provider here could be the ““two or more employees””. Those in-house people whom my noble friend speaks of would be the group of workers. That is how I think it would be done but, if I am wrong about that, I shall let him know. It seems to me that that is how the challenge would be used. However, if my noble friend is talking about procurement and there is an existing body, I do not see any circumstances in which that existing body will not be able to participate in the procurement exercise. I hope that that is helpful.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c1443 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Assets Council tax Contracts for services Casinos Housing Land Freedom of information Licensing Liability Greater London Gambling EU law Fines Empty property Increases European communities Local government Motor vehicles Northern Ireland Local government finance Litter Property Business rates Referendums Procurement Local government services Ombudsman Parish and town councils Scotland Voluntary organisations Young people Wales Repairs and maintenance Smoking Local Government Ombudsman Pedicabs Petitions
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk