Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011.


Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011

Leaving aside altogether the argument about the declaratory provision, does the noble and learned Lord accept the opinion given, for example, by the Church of England's lawyers, with which I fully agree, that in any event, under the Equality Act, there could not conceivably be unlawful discrimination in the provision of goods, services and facilities, nor could there be a breach of a public sector duty because no public function is exercised by religious organisations? Therefore, quite apart from the belt-and-braces declaratory provision, there would be no conceivable case of unlawful discrimination.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c1423 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Civil partnerships Ceremonies Equality Discrimination Marriage Registration Religious freedom Religious buildings
Legislation
Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk